Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited v UASA obo Pietersen and, - Saber mais. Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited v UASA obo Pietersen and Others JR641/2016 2018 ZALCJHB 72 2018 39 ILJ 1330 LC 27 February 2018 Download original fil PDF format, Equally so, there is an even greater need for the Commission for Conciliation Mediation and Arbitration CCMA ....

Sidumo v Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd & Others [2007] 12 BLLR 1097 (CC) is a landmark case in South African labour law, which among other things, established the test to be used by judges in reviewing awards made by commissioners.. INTRODUCTION. According to the Constitutional Court, the question to be asked when reviewing awards is; was the decision …

NAVSA AJ:1 Introduction CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF SOUTH AFRICA Z SIDUMO CONGRESS OF SOUTH AFRICAN TRADE UNIONS versus RUSTENBURG PLATINUM MINES LTD COMMISSION FOR CONCILIATION, MEDIATION AND ARBITRATION Case CCT 85/06 [2007] ZACC 22 First Applicant Second Applicant First Respondent Second …

On 17 May 2018 at 10h00, the Constitutional Court handed down judgment in an application for leave to appeal against an order of the Labour Appeal Court. Mr Bester, who is represented by the first respondent, the South African Equity Workers Association (SAEWA), a registered trade union, was an employee of the applicant, Rustenburg Platinum ...

Sidumo v Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd Others 2007 12 BLLR 1097 CC, Gold Fields Mining South Africa Pty Ltd v CCMA and Others 2014 35 ILJ LAC, stating that Sidumo does not postulate a test that merely requires a simple evaluation of the evidence presented to a LIFE AFTER SIDUMO CLARIFYING THE REVIEW TEST By Sandile,...

Sidumo and Another v Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd and Others (CCT 85 of 2006) [2007] ZACC 22 (05 October 2007); Court name. Constitutional Court of South Africa. ... Mediation and Arbitration (CCMA), should. approach a dismissal with "a measure of deference" because "it is primarily the function of the employer" to decide on a proper

Prior to Sidumo v Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd1 the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration2 applied the "reasonable employer"-test to determine whether a specific sanction, which was issued by an employer, was fair. In Nampak Corrugated Wade ville v Khoza3 the Labour Appeal Court4 held that the determination

Mon, 05/11/2007 - 02:11. Dismissal for failure to search: Stage 1 CCMA finds penalty too harsh,Stage 2 the Labour Court upholds that decision, Stage 3 the Labour Appeal Court rejects the CCMA commissioner's reasoning but upholds the decision. Stage 4 The employer approaches the Supreme Court of Appeal who find the dismissal fair.

The platinum is partly in the form of native metal, invariably alloyed with iron (ferro-platinum) and partly as the sulphide, arsenide and sulph-arsenides, these latter being in intimate association with sulphides of iron, nickel and copper. At the Rustenburg mine the platinum compounds preponderate, while at the Union mine the ferro-platinum ...

Geographic coordinates. Geographic coordinates: 27.33478, -25.66331 (WGS84) Elevation. 1204. Relative position. 10 KILOMETERS EAST OF THE TOWN OF RUSTENBURG. Political divisions (FIPS codes) South Africa (country)

The Page Description. Sidumo v Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd Others 2007 12 BLLR 1097 CC, Gold Fields Mining South Africa Pty Ltd v CCMA and Others 2014 35 ILJ LAC, stating that Sidumo does not postulate a test that merely requires a simple evaluation of the evidence presented to a LIFE AFTER SIDUMO CLARIFYING THE REVIEW TEST By Sandile,...

Find company research, competitor information, contact details & financial data for RUSTENBURG PLATINUM MINES LTD of RUSTENBURG, North West. Get the latest business insights from Dun & Bradstreet.

George v Western Cape Education Department & another (1995) 16 ILJ 1529 (IC) Gerber v Algorax (Pty) Ltd (1999) 20 ILJ 2994 (CCMA) Gerber v Stanlib Asset Management (Pty) Ltd (JA92/20) [2021] ZALAC 51 (13 December 2021) Gideon J Kok v Ndaka Security and Services case no FSWK2448-21 dated 25 January 2022.

Rustenburg Platinum Mines, located at 4 Spreeu Ave, Amandelbult. Phone 014 787 0... send Email... Think Local

Fedsure Life Assurance v Greater Transitional Metropolitan Council. 1999 (1) SA 374 (CC); 1998 (12) BCLR 1458 (CC) Supreme Court of Appeal Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd (Rustenburg Section) v CCMA. 2007 (1) SA 567 (SCA) Labour Appeal Court Shoprite Checkers (Pty) Ltd v Ramdaw NO and Others (2001) 9 BLLR 1011 (LAC)

Sidumo and Congress of SA Trade Unions v Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd, the CCMA and Moropa NO (2008) 19 SALLR 35 (CC): the following pertinent facts appear in this case. The applicant, Mr Sidumo, was employed by the respondent employer, Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd in December 1985 as part of the latter's security services. In

SIDUMO v RUSTENBURG PLATINUM MINES Jurisdiction Constitutional Court of South Africa Subject Appeal and Review Issue: The employee, a security guard, was dismissed by the employer for failing to search employees in accordance with the prescribed policy, or not searching them at all. The CCMA found that the dismissal was procedurally fair, but that the …

Page 165 ­ 2008 (2) BCLR 158 (CC) machinery were investigated. Over three days, in April 2000, the Mine resorted to video surveillance of employee performance at various points, including the point where Mr Sidumo did duty at the Redressing Section. This revealed that of 24 specifically monitored instances involving Mr Sidumo, he conducted ...

Oct 21, 2011 0183 32 Southern Sun Hotel Interests Pty Ltd v CCMA others 2009 11, inferred from the judgment in Sidumo another v Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd ....

Monday, July 09, 2007. COMMENT ON RUSTENBURG PLATINUM MINES v CCMA & OTHERS. [2006] SCA 115 (RSA) Mike Wagener. When I studied jurisprudence, I was intrigued by the sentiment expressed by an American judge who said that he decided a case before him within the first 5 minutes and then tried his best not to be influenced by the …

first respondent, Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd (the Mine), which as its name suggests, is a company principally involved in mining platinum, employed Mr Sidumo as part of its Security Services. He was a constable until 1992. Thereafter he was promoted to the position of a Grade II patrolman. On 20 January 2000, Mr Sidumo

The Rustenburg operations were acquired from Anglo American Platinum (Amplats) in November 2016 for a cash payment of R1.5 billion (US$110.5 million) on closing and a deferred payment equal to 35% of the distributable free cash flow generated by the operations over a six-year period (can be extended to eight-year) amounting to a minimum of R3 billion …

Rustenburg Platinum Mines Limited, located at 62 Zendeling Str, Rustenburg. Phone 014 592 8... send Email... Think Local

4.In Sidumo & Another v Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd & Others (2007) 28 ILJ 2405 (CC) the Constitutional Court held that the test to be used when determining whether an arbitration award would be unreasonable, and therefore reviewable, is whether the decision of the arbitrator is a decision "that a reasonable decision maker could not reach."

rustenburg platinum mines limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of anglo american platinum limited, ("rpm") has issued a section 189 (3) notice to relevant parties in terms of section 189a of the labour relations act, 66 of 1995, for the commencement of a consultation process on the proposed redesign of rpm's organisational support structure that …

FACULTY OF LAW A CRITICAL ANALYSIS OF HOW THE, REASONABLENESS IN REVIEWING ARBITRATION AWARDS, Acama Uzell Brett, declare that A critical analysis of how the courts apply the standard of reasonableness in reviewing arbitration awards is my own work and that it has not been, Rustenburg Platinum mines Ltd v CCMA others...

Platinum Mines Ltd (Rustenberg Section) v CCMA and other (1998) 19 IJL 327 (LC). 12. However, there are other decisions of this court which suggest that such a referral may be made in a representative capacity. Etschmailer v CCMA & others (1999) 20 IJL 144 (LC) p150 para 50.

Rustenburg Platinum Mines – North West and Northern Province Name: Rustenburg Platinum Mines (RPM) Location: RPM comprises three main mining sections – Rustenburg, Union and Amandelbult in the ...

awards is Sidumo & Another v Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd & others [2007] 12 BLLR 1097 (CC). At ... In De Beers Consolidated Mines Ltd v CCMA & others [2000] 9 BLLR 995 (LAC) para 22, the ... Ltd v CCMA & others [2008] 9 BLLR 838 (LAC) para 21 the court quoted this dictum with approval. In Shoprite, the employee consumed company property ...

Feb 3,2015 Sidumo v Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd & Others [2007] 12 BLLR 1097 (CC) is a landmark case in South African labour law, which among other things, established the test to be used by judges in reviewing awards made by commissioners. INTRODUCTION

At the CCMA hearing the mine's assistant chief chemist, Mr Williams, explained why the redressing station, where ore was extracted from platinum group metals (platinum, vanadium, rhodium, iridium, ruthenium), was a 'high risk area'. The mine's losses could not be attributed to ore quality or equipment

historic judgment concerning our labour-law jurisprudence in Sidumo v Rustenburg Platinum Mines. 1 This judgment was eagerly awaited by both employers as well as employees and was of significant importance to the Commission for Conciliation, Mediation and Arbitration 2 and other relevant 1 [2007] 12 BLLR 1097 (CC). 2 Hereinafter "the CCMA".

Find below are the list of Mines In Rustenburg In South Africa. Benhaus Mining (Pty) Ltd. Address: Plot 27, Waterfall, Rustenburg, 0300 Hours: Closes soon ⋅ 4:30PM ⋅ Reopens 7:30PM Phone: 014 592 6677. Jabula Mining Systems. Address: 6 Bosch St, Rustenburg Oos-Einde, Rustenburg, 2999 Phone: 014 596 9560. Rustenburg Platinum Mines Ltd

(1) the test to be applied on review of a CCMA award; and (2) the primary test which the CCMA must apply to an employer's decision to dismiss. The facts of the case are as follows: 1. The employer mine produces platinum to which the employees have access.

Section) v National Union of Mine Workers (2001) 22 ILJ 658 (LAC). In this case an employee had been employed on the mine as cleaner in the kitchen for some fifteen years. She was dismissed for attempting unlawfully to remove meatballs from the kitchen. The mine had a strict policy on theft or the unauthorized possession of company property.